陳栠勛圖releases survey results on spare circuit breaker procedures
陳栠勛圖is following up with results of a survey it sent to members in 2021 to gather feedback on procedures for spare circuit breakers in health care facilities.
The survey was prompted by an alert from The Joint Commission (TJC) stating circuit breakers labeled as spare in either the circuit breaker legend or panel schedule and toggled to the on position would result in a requirement for improvement (RFI). The accrediting organization stated that findings would be scored under Environment of Care (EC) Standard EC.02.05.01, Element of Performance 9: The [organization] labels utility system controls to facilitate partial or complete emergency shutdowns.
The 陳栠勛圖survey sought to gather member feedback to gauge if internal policies at health care facilities differed from TJCs stance, especially considering that the National Fire Protection Associations NFPA 70簧, National Electrical Code簧, 2011 edition, takes a neutral stance on whether to have spare circuit breakers toggled to the on or off position. In fact, the NFPAs Healthcare Interpretations Task Force was posed with the question, Do NFPA 70-2011 and subsequent editions require properly labeled spare breakers to be kept in any specific position, either on or off? at the . The committees answer was a simple, No. In its 2021 survey, 陳栠勛圖found that:
- More than 83% of survey respondents keep spare circuit breakers in the off position.
- More than 5% keep them in the on position.
- More than 10% report they do not keep them in any specific position.
The majority of survey respondents who keep spare circuit breakers in the off position report doing so to comply with TJCs Standard EC.02.05.01. However, about 30% of those same respondents also stated that they disagreed with TJCs stance and believe that the on position provides a greater degree of safety and ease for electricians when searching for tripped circuit breakers.